TPDI — Copenhague, Denmark
Updated March 27, 2026
Statistics for Copenhague
Total Analyses
5
Activities Analyzed
2
Dominant Actor
Platforms
69.0%
Direct Booking
10.0%
Agentic Readiness (ARI)
Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets
60/100 (13 operators)
ARI breakdown▼
| Block | Score |
|---|---|
| Structure | 14/25 |
| Execution | 15/25 |
| Completeness | 18/25 |
| Freshness | 8/15 |
| Performance | 5/10 |
Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected
Methodology updated — March 2026
In Copenhague, the TPDI score is 77/100, with 10% direct booking and an ARI of 60/100. Visibility structure: 69% platforms, 13% local operators, 10% resellers.
Visibility Structure in CopenhagueTPDI — Copenhague, Denmark
Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city
Platforms : 69% · Local Operators : 13% · Resellers : 10% · DMO (official tourism office) : 7% · Editorial : 2%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Booking Signals in CopenhagueTPDI — Copenhague, Denmark
Average distribution of booking methods offered
Direct Booking : 10% · Platform (OTA) : 77% · Contact Only : 5% · No Signal Detected : 8%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Copenhague, Denmark
Score : 77 / 100
The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Copenhague, Denmark
Between $119 and $237 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.
Stays local : ~$822 · Commission leakage : $119–$237
Scale with your real volume.
How is this calculated?
Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Activities and Criteria in Copenhague
Explore by activity (all countries) →All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria