TPDI — Bruges, Belgium
Updated April 1, 2026
Statistics for Bruges
Total Analyses
7
Activities Analyzed
2
Dominant Actor
Platforms
65.0%
Direct Booking
12.0%
Agentic Readiness (ARI)
Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets
58/100 (19 operators)
ARI breakdown▼
| Block | Score |
|---|---|
| Structure | 13/25 |
| Execution | 15/25 |
| Completeness | 19/25 |
| Freshness | 8/15 |
| Performance | 4/10 |
Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected
Methodology updated — March 2026
In Bruges, the TPDI score is 79/100, with 12% direct booking and an ARI of 58/100. Visibility structure: 65% platforms, 12% local operators, 15% resellers.
Visibility Structure in BrugesTPDI — Bruges, Belgium
Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city
Platforms : 65% · Local Operators : 12% · Resellers : 15% · DMO (official tourism office) : 6% · Editorial : 2%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Booking Signals in BrugesTPDI — Bruges, Belgium
Average distribution of booking methods offered
Direct Booking : 12% · Platform (OTA) : 79% · Contact Only : 1% · No Signal Detected : 8%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Bruges, Belgium
Score : 79 / 100
The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Bruges, Belgium
Between $120 and $240 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.
Stays local : ~$820 · Commission leakage : $120–$240
Scale with your real volume.
How is this calculated?
Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Activities and Criteria in Bruges
Explore by activity (all countries) →All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria