holaOlas logo
holaOlas logo

TPDI — Miami, United States

Updated March 12, 2026

Statistics for Miami

Total Analyses

2

Activities Analyzed

1

Dominant Actor

Platforms

67.0%

Direct Booking

10.0%

Agentic Readiness (ARI)

Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets

54/100 (5 operators)

ARI breakdown
BlockScore
Structure15/25
Execution17/25
Completeness17/25
Freshness10/15
Performance5/10

Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected

Methodology updated — March 2026

In Miami, the TPDI score is 83/100, with 10% direct booking and an ARI of 54/100. Visibility structure: 67% platforms, 10% local operators, 17% resellers.

Visibility Structure in MiamiTPDI — Miami, United States

Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city

Platforms : 67% · Local Operators : 10% · Resellers : 17% · DMO (official tourism office) : 2% · Editorial : 4%

Source: TPDI · ARI

Booking Signals in MiamiTPDI — Miami, United States

Average distribution of booking methods offered

Direct Booking : 10% · Platform (OTA) : 83% · Contact Only : 0% · No Signal Detected : 6%

Source: TPDI · ARI

Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Miami, United States

Score : 83 / 100

083 / 100100

The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.

Source: TPDI · ARI

Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Miami, United States

Between $126 and $252 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.

Stays local : ~$811 · Commission leakage : $126–$252

Scale with your real volume.

How is this calculated?

Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.

Source: TPDI · ARI

Activities and Criteria in Miami

Explore by activity (all countries) →

All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria