TPDI — Rotterdam, Netherlands
Updated March 17, 2026
Statistics for Rotterdam
Total Analyses
1
Activities Analyzed
1
Dominant Actor
Platforms
57.0%
Direct Booking
32.0%
Agentic Readiness (ARI)
Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets
54/100 (8 operators)
ARI breakdown▼
| Block | Score |
|---|---|
| Structure | 13/25 |
| Execution | 14/25 |
| Completeness | 15/25 |
| Freshness | 8/15 |
| Performance | 4/10 |
Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected
Methodology updated — March 2026
In Rotterdam, the TPDI score is 61/100, with 32% direct booking and an ARI of 54/100. Visibility structure: 57% platforms, 29% local operators, 7% resellers.
Visibility Structure in RotterdamTPDI — Rotterdam, Netherlands
Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city
Platforms : 57% · Local Operators : 29% · Resellers : 7% · DMO (official tourism office) : 4% · Editorial : 4%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Booking Signals in RotterdamTPDI — Rotterdam, Netherlands
Average distribution of booking methods offered
Direct Booking : 32% · Platform (OTA) : 61% · Contact Only : 0% · No Signal Detected : 7%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Rotterdam, Netherlands
Score : 61 / 100
The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Rotterdam, Netherlands
Between $96 and $192 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.
Stays local : ~$856 · Commission leakage : $96–$192
Scale with your real volume.
How is this calculated?
Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Activities and Criteria in Rotterdam
Explore by activity (all countries) →All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria