TPDI — Amsterdam, Netherlands
Updated March 13, 2026
Statistics for Amsterdam
Total Analyses
4
Activities Analyzed
1
Dominant Actor
Platforms
45.0%
Direct Booking
30.0%
Agentic Readiness (ARI)
Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets
53/100 (30 operators)
ARI breakdown▼
| Block | Score |
|---|---|
| Structure | 13/25 |
| Execution | 14/25 |
| Completeness | 16/25 |
| Freshness | 6/15 |
| Performance | 4/10 |
Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected
Methodology updated — March 2026
In Amsterdam, the TPDI score is 67/100, with 30% direct booking and an ARI of 53/100. Visibility structure: 45% platforms, 30% local operators, 24% resellers.
Visibility Structure in AmsterdamTPDI — Amsterdam, Netherlands
Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city
Platforms : 45% · Local Operators : 30% · Resellers : 24% · DMO (official tourism office) : 1%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Booking Signals in AmsterdamTPDI — Amsterdam, Netherlands
Average distribution of booking methods offered
Direct Booking : 30% · Platform (OTA) : 67% · Contact Only : 2% · No Signal Detected : 1%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Amsterdam, Netherlands
Score : 67 / 100
The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Amsterdam, Netherlands
Between $104 and $207 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.
Stays local : ~$844 · Commission leakage : $104–$207
Scale with your real volume.
How is this calculated?
Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Activities and Criteria in Amsterdam
Explore by activity (all countries) →All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria