TPDI — Kyoto, Japan
Updated April 4, 2026
Statistics for Kyoto
Total Analyses
1
Activities Analyzed
1
Dominant Actor
Platforms
36.0%
Direct Booking
20.0%
Agentic Readiness (ARI)
Structural and transactional readiness for AI-mediated travel markets
46/100 (5 operators)
ARI breakdown▼
| Block | Score |
|---|---|
| Structure | 11/25 |
| Execution | 11/25 |
| Completeness | 15/25 |
| Freshness | 4/15 |
| Performance | 5/10 |
Partially executable — structural and freshness gaps detected
Methodology updated — March 2026
In Kyoto, the TPDI score is 72/100, with 20% direct booking and an ARI of 46/100. Visibility structure: 36% platforms, 20% local operators, 36% resellers.
Visibility Structure in KyotoTPDI — Kyoto, Japan
Average distribution of actor types in analyses for this city
Platforms : 36% · Local Operators : 20% · Resellers : 36% · DMO (official tourism office) : 4% · Editorial : 4%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Booking Signals in KyotoTPDI — Kyoto, Japan
Average distribution of booking methods offered
Direct Booking : 20% · Platform (OTA) : 72% · Contact Only : 0% · No Signal Detected : 8%
Source: TPDI · ARI
Intermediary dependency indexTPDI — Kyoto, Japan
Score : 72 / 100
The higher the index, the more the market depends on platforms and resellers to sell.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Estimated commission leakageTPDI — Kyoto, Japan
Between $108 and $216 out of every $1,000 go to commissions.
Stays local : ~$838 · Commission leakage : $108–$216
Scale with your real volume.
How is this calculated?
Based on commonly observed commission ranges in tourism: platforms and resellers typically charge between 15% and 30%. Actual rates vary by contract.
Source: TPDI · ARI
Activities and Criteria in Kyoto
Explore by activity (all countries) →All analyzed activities with their differentiating criteria